Saturday, December 22, 2012

The fools and the ugly truth

Been a bit down lately. Not really the sort of thing that you ought to be feelings when you are in the last week of the semester. Thank god now it is over. It is hard to imagine how I even managed to survive all the tests, assignment submissions, replacement classes and one particular fool in just one week.

You see I had just finished a presentation of mine for one particular subject. All of the sudden the lecturer said to me that she is not happy with my presentation and I had to take a test to improve my marks. This upsets me a little bit. She said our presentation is not good enough because there are sooooooo many graphs but only two recommendations and conclusions. We had our reasons for doing that. And to make it worse she agreed with us before when we showed her our draft only to disagree during the presentation!

Here is the reason why there are only two conclusions and recommendations.

1) She said before during our classes we only need to put the important part of our report into the presentation. So since our conclusions and recommendations is more or less the same we can summarize most of them into just two. And she agreed with us when we showed her.

2) This one is going to be a bit difficult to explain. You see even though we have a lot of graphs in our presentation we only have a few questioner questions.. Why is that you may ask? Because there is only a question but it required us to do a multiple graphs.

Here is an example of the question.

Rate the following organization into your preferred choices of ranking from 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th.

And here is an example of the answers by multiple respondents.




The only way we can analyze a question of this nature is by making a graph of each aspect (Student bodies, faculty, universities, private sector and government sectors). So for this question alone we will have 5 graphs... But does that mean we will have 5 conclusions and recommendations? HELL NO! One question is one question. One question only has one objective. We only need to make one conclusion and recommendation that is the overall of the five graphs.

And she agreed with us when we show the draft to her earlier.


Now you see and understand why I am so pissed off. How come you agreed with something and then disagreed with it all of the sudden? If what we did was wrong why didn't you correct us earlier when we showed you the draft? That is the function of the draft! It is so you can correct us if we did something wrong to avoid us from doing it in the real assignment.

As for the test I miss the test before due to a high fever and she refuses to let me take the test because according to her she already key in the mark in the system. I begged her multiple number of times but all her answers had been a big "NO!". So how come now it is okay to take the test? Doesn't this contradict all the things she said to me before?

I had no problem with taking the test. It is a really good chance for me to improve my marks. But she pissed me off again when she refused to give my classmates their test paper simply because I'm taking the test. This is unfair to my classmates.

So in order to make it up to my friends I apologize to classmates for what happen and said I don't understand my her lecturer of what she did.

You want to know what happen next? All of the sudden there is a particular fool who said I'm bad mouthing my lecturer. All I said is "I don't understand her" -..-" does that sound like badmouthing someone to you? And the fools said what my lecturer did was the right thing despite all the evidences saying she is wrong.

You want to know what the other reason that make you a complete fool? Someone who does not understand the true story but still want to talk loudly like you understand it?

It is the true reason of my lecturer forcing me to take the test.

Turn out my lecturer has no power to ban a student from taking a test. Thus she had to make me take the test no matter what in the end. When I take the test the room is filled with people who is in an almost similar situation with myself. According to my seniors she did this nearly every freaking semester!  She will blame the student for something in the classrooms (Usually something that involves our carry mark) and then said to the student she will give the student a second chance to improve the student mark by taking the test! Not allowing a student to take the test is her way to punish students whose skip her class or repeatedly coming late to her classes....

It just so happens I'm the unlucky guy this semester.... T_T Good grief... I don't believe such lecturer even exist in this world.

So now you finally understand why she blames our presentation group for something that we already consulted her on and she herself already agreed on? And why it pissed me off so much? I hope so.

Fools... Fools everywhere... Dear readers take an advise from me, know the true story or situation before talking about it. It would make the world a much better place and you can avoid yourself from becoming a complete fool.

Friday, January 20, 2012

Teori aku kini hakim debat bertaraf ASEAN

14 hari bulan Januri lepas aku ada pergi kursus kehakiman debat keamanan ala presiden inter IPT ASEAN anjuran Universiti Pertahanan National Malaysia (UPNM). Dengan pentauliahan sijil dari UPNM selepas aku tamat kursus tu maka aku dengan rasminya layak untuk menjadi hakim untuk mana-mana pertandingan debat Bahasa Melayu sehingga ke peringkat ASEAN.

Wajah berkaliber seorang hakim debat.. ( konon -.-" ) Thanks kat abang Joe sebab tolong snap pic nih time bengkel nih.
Ok -.-" Actually aku pun still tak berapa nak boleh telan mana hakikat nih. Maklumlah aku ni baru lagi dalam bidang debat Bahasa Melayu nih. My actual background was in English debate. Aku start involve dengan debat Bahasa Melayu sejak aku jadi high committee untuk Debat 211 Jam UiTM dan Utusan Malaysia dulu.Time tu pun aku involve sebab nak cari pengalaman jer. Kat sini la gak aku kenal lecturer Pn. Hajah Noriza atau pun nama glamour dia mama. Bila UPNM contact mama untuk hantar beberapa orang student dia untuk dilatih menjadi hakim untuk debat keamanan nih mama bagi la nama-nama student yang pernah kerja dengan dia waktu debat 211 jam dulu. Tapi malangnya aku baru jer tukar no phone time tu so mama tak boleh nak contact aku. So aku terlepas lah bengkel sesi 1 kat UPNM tuh.. 

Bila mama dengar dia orang nak buat sesi 2 pulak mama cepat-cepat cari aku. Sebelum dia cakap kat pasal bengkel tu aku tadah telinga dulu seminit dua dengar dia meleter pasal tukar nombor phone tak cakap kat dia -.-" "Allah.. Alamak.. sorry mama.. lupa hehe.." tu je la yang boleh aku cakap haha. So mama pun story la pasal bengkel sesi 2 dekat SMK Seri Ampangan, Seremban, Negeri Sembilan tuh.
So nak dipendekkan cite skit aku pun terasa macam nak join la bengkel tu. Tapi satu lagi masalah timbul. Aku nak pergi dengan saper? Puas aku cari member-member aku kot-kot dia orang nak join gak. Tapi maybe atas faktor jauh sangat tak ader pun yang nak pergi.. yer lah, Seremban dengan Shah Alam dekat dua jam kot.

Aku hampir-hampir give up nak join bengkel tu.. Tapi last-last aku nekad nak bawak moto sorang-sorang pergi seremban tu. Nak memparahkan keadaan bengkel tu pukul 8 pagi la pulak start! Nak tak nak aku kena gerak bawak moto dalam pukul 5 pagi nak pergi Seremban untuk make sure sampai on time -.-" Sebab aku tak tau jalan aku telefon abang Joe dulu. Abang Joe ni actually senior aku. Dia student course DPLI dekat fakulti aku. Rumah dia dekat je dengan SMK Seri Ampangan tu. So dia kata aku bawak je motor tu sampai plaza tol Seremban-Port Dickson lepas dia guide aku pergi sekolah tu dengan kereta dia.

Ok motor aku tak ader la besar macam ni sebenarnya -.-"
Korang pernah tak bawak motor long distance dalam pukul 5 pagi? Nasihat aku kalau nak naik motor subuh-subuh ni sila pakai sweater setebal mungkin sebab memang macam nak beku je sejuk dia! Tangan aku bila sampai tol Seremban Port Dickson tu macam dah beku dan melekat kat handle bar motor tu -.-" Nasib abang Joe dan memang ready tunggu kat tol tu. Lepas tu aku pergi parking motor aku dekat masjid yang dekat dengan tol tu sebab abg Joe suruh naik kereta dia jer. Lupa pulak aku nama masjid tu tapi kalau tak silap masjid tu kat bawah jejantas la.

Bila kita orang sampai kat SMK Seri Ampangan tu gate sekolah tu tutup lagi. Bila kita orang tanya mak guard yang in charge dia mintak surat kebenaran. Mana la kita orang ada surat tu -.-" Kita orang pun call la abang Ah Choi, senior yang inform Mama pasal event nih. Dia ajak kita orang lepak dekat warung yang ada dekat sekolah tu dulu sementara nak tunggu cikgu yang bertugas tu datang bukak gate sekolah tu. Sempat la gak aku breakfast ala kadar jap kat warung tu. Dalam pukul 8.30 pagi kita orang pun masuk la sekolah tu. Kalau tak silap dalam pukul 9 pagi baru bengkel tu start lepas pendaftaran semua.

Petugas yang mostly student UPNM ngah bertugas bendaftarkan perserta-peserta bengkel
Yang pakai baju melayu biru tu la abang Ah Choi, dia alumni UiTM yang responsible untuk latih bakal-bakal hakim nih ^^ biar pun muka dia nampak macam garang dia actually boleh tahan sengal gak -.-"
Abang Ah Choi ngah bagi explanation pasal format debat ala presiden
Abang Joe, My DPLI senior ^^

Kak Waina, which is also one of my DPLI senior ^^
Bakal-bakal hakim tekun mendengar ceramah pemarkahan
Hakim-hakim sewaktu minum pagi
Salah seorang pendabat menyampaikan hujan sewaktu demo debat
Salah seorang wakil hakim bertanyakan soalan kat pendebat
Sesi penyampaian sijil =)
Finally official jadi hakim =) Ok terexpose nama sebenar lak -.-"
To be frank sebenarnya waktu bengkel sesi kedua tu aku sorang je student degree. Yang lain mostly dah grad atau pun cikgu-cikgu sekolah. Sampai kan aku pun dia orang tembak panggil cikgu Syafiq tuh -.-" Haha.. tak per la kot skali skali merasa jadi cikgu. Lepas habis program tu aku terus balik. Tapi nak dijadikan cerita minyak moto aku habis la pulak tengah jalan tuh -.-" Nasib baik petronas dah dekat dah time tu, kalau tak memang melopong la aku tunda moto tu. Lain kali kalau nak pinjam moto tu make sure meter minyak function. Kalau tak jadi la macam aku nih -___-


Thursday, January 12, 2012

Teori blogger perlu cari pasangan bukan blogger kalau nak kekal

Apa kes tah tiba-tiba aku nak berteori bagai nih -.-" I don't know, suddenly this thought cross my head. Korang pernah terfikir tak pasal ni? Haha.. You know, we as bloggers always seems to define our self as a complicated bunch of people. That is why we need our blog to express our ideas.. thought.. memory.. and of course not to be forgotten the ever popular theme in writing a blog post, our own freaking feelings. Ok apa aku meraban ni -.-" Baiklah! Demi untuk memudahkan korang faham dalam bahasa mudahnya sesetengah bloggers ni merupakan golongan yang sering berfikir terlalu banyak atau mempunyai fikiran yang memang complicated. Disebabkan itulah sesetengah dari kami ni buat blog. Supaya kami ada channel untuk express segala idea kami. Sesetengah yer! Bukan semua blogger macam tu =)

Bloggers sometimes define themselves as a complicated bunch of people..
Sebelum aku pergi dengan lebih dalam pasal topik ni baik aku cite skit apa itu teori. According to merriam webster dictionary website theory is a abstract thought or a speculation. Teori merupakan satu buah fikiran yang abstract atau tak lebih dari sekadar satu spekulasi. Jadi kalau korang tak setuju ke apa tak perlu la nak marah kat aku atau apa sebab teori ni tak semestinya betul atau boleh apply kat semua orang =) ( Nama pun teori bukan fakta tau! )

So back on the main topic why do you think a blogger or a blog writer need to find a partner among a non blog writer? Untuk faham pasal ni kita kena pergi balik pada pendapat bahawa blogger merupakan golongan yang berfikiran complicated. Kalau blogger ni boleh dikatakan sebagai mereka yang complicated maybe mereka yang bukan blogger tu merupakan golongan yang lebih simple stail pemikiran dia orang. Lebih simple pada pendapat aku kat sini dia just go with the flow dah tak terlebih fikir sangat pasal satu-satu benda tu. Kita ambik buah durian sebagai contoh. Yer... korang tak silap baca. Aku baru saje kata aku nak guna buah durian sebagai contoh untuk explain pasal orang complicated dan simple nih -.-" 

Kes membeli durian 1

Kenapa dengan aku nih hah??? Dalam banyak benda durian gak aku buat contoh, bukan aku makan pun -.-"

Mereka yang simple maybe bila dia orang nampak buah durian apa yang mereka fikir "Weh! Durian weh! Kalau bawak balik makan ngan roommates best nih!". Manakala untuk mereka yang complicated lak mereka maybe dia orang fikir "Weh ada durian! Eh jap? Agak-agak durian ni jenis apa yer? Jual kira kilo ke kira bijik nih? Hmmm.. Kalau aku beli tak habis lak nak buat macam mana lak? Tak kan nak buat tompoyak lak kot... Housemate-housemate aku kat rumah tu makan tak tempoyak? Karang membazir lak, maybe...(Aku potong sampai sini je sebab banyak sangat persoalan dia nih -.-" )

So yeah, maybe mereka yang complicated ni nampak berbeza atau lain kalau nak compare dengan mereka yang simple nih. But do you know that differences are the same things that will complete us for each other? Kenapa pada pendapat aku perbezaan tu yang buat kita sesuai untuk satu sama lain? Jawapan dia mudah je =) 

Kita ambik kes membeli durian lagi sebagai contoh. Cuma kali ni kita tukar pelaku dia dengan satu pasangan yang lelakinya simple tapi perempuan dia complicated. Eceh, siap guna perkataan "pelaku" tuh. Dah macam research betul lak kan -.-" Kita tembak je nama pasangan ni Kamariah dengan Kassim yer :3

Gambar hiasan, korang guna je la imaginasi korang bayang ni Kassim dengan Kamariah yer.

Kes membeli durian 2

Kassim: Awak, ada orang jual durian lah kat depan tu, kita beli nak?

Kamariah: Nak beli tu boleh tapi kita nak makan kat mana?

Kassim: Alah.. Kita jangan la beli yang belum bukak. Beli je yang dah bukak dan pack dalam bekas plastik semua.. Sambil minum kat mana-mana pun kita boleh makan.

Kamariah: Hmm.. tapi awak jangan beli banyak sangat tau, saya risau tak habis, membazir je nanti. Beli skit tak per, kalau rasa nak lagi kita boleh je beli lagi.

Kasim: Haha.. pandai lak calon bini saya fikir pasal saving eh? Haha.. ni sayang kak awak nih! 

Kamariah: Ala abang nih.. dah mula la tu~

Ok... tiba-tiba aku menyampah dengan diri aku sendiri atas kemampuan aku menulis dialog gedik macam nih -.-" Ehem! Ok! Walaubagaimanapun korang dah nampakkan macam mana fikiran Kassim yang simple di balance kan dengan fikirang Kamariah yang complicated. In a much more simpler word they complete each other! Korang faham tak nih?? Aku dah guna contoh yang habis mudah ni tau!

Cuba korang bayangkan kalau dua-dua tu fikiran complicated... agak-agak bila korang rasa baru dia orang beli durian tu yer? Agaknya sampai ke malam pun dia orang dok fikir lagi baik buruk beli durian tuh -.-" Samalah kalau dua-dua fikiran simple, agak-agak sampai sebakul besar kot dia orang angkut bawak balik nanti! Kalau kes macam tu jadi apa korang rasa akan jadi? Kalau korang nak tau baca contoh kat bawah nih =)

Kalau kes tu jadi (Fikiran simple)

Kassim: Ni semua salah awak! Kenapa tak warning awal-awal kita terlebih beli?! Awak makan la durian ni satu bakul sampai habis!

Kamariah: EH! Apa pasal pulak! Bukan awak ke yang mengada-ngada nak beli durian tadi??! Awak ni memang tau bla bla bla..

Kalau kes tu jadi (Fikiran complicated)

Kassim: Banyak songeh la awak nih! Kita nak beli durian je awak bukan nak beli kereta! Jangan-jangan bila nak pilih pelamin kaler apa nanti awak mengada-ngada macam ni gak ke???!

Kamariah: Eh, Hello! Sapa mengada-ngada sekarang?? Awak ke saya??? Saya cuma nak jimat duit! Awak tu yang ngada-ngada pilih durian sampai dua tiga jam! bla bla bla..

Kedua-dua kes pergaduhan ini berterusan sehinggalah apek yang jual durian tu blah sebab dah fed up nak melayan kerenah manusia serupa beruk dua ekor tersebut.

Tak semestinya bila kita serupa kita akan secocok... kadang-kadang perbezaan itu yang akan menyatukan kita.. Dah macam ahli falsafah kan aku nih haha.. -.-" Ok berbalik kepada teori blogger perlu cari pasangan bukan blogger tadi aku rasa korang patut dah faham hujah-hujah aku yer. Ini cuma sekadar pendapat =) Tak semesti perlu terasa atau terfikir sama ada korang dah salah cari pasangan dalam relationship korang nih. Kalau korang suka kat dia teruskan je la, kenapa nak ada second doubt kan? Asalkan dia tak memudaratkan dia orang dari sisi agama dan sosial itu sudah cukup baik alhamdulilah.. That conclude today post! Waktu aku habis tulis post subuh baru je masuk. So aku nak pergi melaksanakan tanggungjawab aku sebagai seorang muslim jap. Till next time then :)

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Why Men and Women Cant be friends (The friendzone Theory)

I found this video at Pauline blog. 


Yeah sure.. a random interview conduct at a library provide proof that is concrete enough to explain the so call "friendzone" theory -.-" You guys should take a peek a this video anyway. It does provide some rather interesting fact regarding this friendzone stuff. Leave a comment if you got one!

Yeah yeah... what ever make you happy dude -.-"

Disclaimer

Any pictures, videos and graphic forms, are not copyrighted as the date taken from the search engines. As if its copyrighted, all credit goes to the owner and I did not own the copyrights. All of the graphic forms are linked with the original source. All of those pictures, videos and graphic forms are not for any commercial use, I gain nothing for those forms of files.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...